·
Surprising job numbers not a big deal……Labor Dept reports this morning that non-farm payrolls
grew by 142k in August, much lower than expected and down 33% from July. The
unemployment rate fell to 6.1%.
What’s
the point? The jobs numbers are a key
datapoint that investors watch to provide a gauge of the strength of the
economy. Characteristics of this economic recovery have been both a) its
relative weakness compared with other post WW-2 recoveries, and b) the
unevenness of virtually all the data we’ve seen since 2009, whether it be job
growth, capital spending, industrial output, etc. The August weakness fits in
with the overall pattern of this recovery: uneven. We don’t see it as a
harbinger of slower growth but rather more of the same: a moderate, uneven
recovery. That said, we do expect some acceleration in economic growth from the
2% range to about 3% in 2015.
·
ECB to pump Euro economy: European Central Bank chief Mario Draghi announced
this week that the ECB will implement a form of quantitative easing (QE) by
purchasing up to $1 trillion in private asset-backed securities.
What’s
the point? The ECB’s QE program is
designed to provide additional liquidity to the Eurozone credit markets, and
thereby help accelerate the economic recovery in Europe and drive inflation
higher. The current state of the Eurozone economy is akin to being in the
“intensive care unit”: essentially zero growth and mild deflation with a very
real risk that deflation could worsen. This, of course, is Draghi’s major
concern. We do not see the Eurozone condition improving any time soon, and we
expect the recovery will be a very gradual process that could take many years.
This has broader implications for the global economy: to the extent the Euro
economy remains in a deep funk, it slows potential growth rate for other major
economies, such as the U.S. and China. It also implies that both inflation and
interest rates could remain low for longer than most investors now expect. This
has both positive and negative implications for financial assets. On balance,
it probably remains more positive for stocks than bonds. We do not expect the
rate of gains in stocks going forward to be a high as we’ve experienced in the
last five years, but returns for stocks could still be healthy, barring
exogenous shocks.
No comments:
Post a Comment