Friday, June 6, 2014

Daily Bullets……For June 6, 2014


·         Employment looking stronger…….Labor Department reporting today that job growth accelerated in May to 217,000, and marked fourth straight month of job gains. Economists believe strengthening employment data indicates Q1 softness was an anomaly and U.S. economy is positioned for stronger growth.
What’s the point? Improving job growth is important for sustaining the economic recovery and, because of its size and diversity, the U.S. economy is in a relatively stronger position to sustain economic growth particularly compared to Europe. Over the past few weeks there has been some increased sentiment that global economic growth would slow and several economists have reduced their U.S. GDP forecasts. The general consensus, however, continues to call for acceleration in U.S. GDP growth rate as we move through 2014. This is positive for sustained growth of U.S. corporate profits which, in turn, should be positive for U.S. equities. Link: http://money.msn.com/business-news/article.aspx?feed=OBR&date=20140606&id=17680783

·         IMF chides China on debt…..The World Bank and International Monetary Fund is out today urging China to curb excessive credit growth in order reduce the risk of bubble-type excesses in certain sectors of its economy, particularly real estate.
What’s the point? We think this is “old news”. We have been hearing for many months now that China’s excess credit growth, particularly its so-called “shadow lending”, may be contributing to rising financial risk for China’s economy. Our sense is the Chinese authorities understand this and are taking measures to reign in credit as they attempt to pilot their economy to slower but more sustainable cruise speed. While it is now understood that China’s economy is slowing, the fact that China is taking more concrete actions to control credit is positive because it reduces the risk of bubble or financial excesses, and improves the likelihood that China can sustain growth on a more “organic” basis and not artificially induced growth through excess credit. We believe this would be a positive for global financial markets. Link: http://money.msn.com/business-news/article.aspx?feed=AP&date=20140606&id=17677201

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment