We talked last week about our firm’s use of triggers in our
investment process. We use triggers not only as a way of managing risk but also
as a way of avoiding emotionally-based decisions. The trigger is part of what
we believe is a rational decision-making process. The trigger essentially sets
a rule or requirement for us to take action in client portfolios based on the
outcome of a perceived risk event that could or will happen usually in the near
future.
When done properly, a rational investment process that can
be repeated greatly reduces the chances or temptation to make emotionally-based
investing. Some of the key elements to a rational process include: a solid
understanding of investment fundamentals and macro risks; having a sound vision
and investment thesis regarding the global investment environment; and having a
sound process for managing risk. When you really boil it down, investing is all
about assessing probabilities and managing risk.
Why is our use of triggers important in managing risk?
Because we attempt to identify risk in a rational way, anticipate this risk,
and have a plan of action to deal with that risk. We consider triggers at every
investment strategy meeting for various macro risks that could be a problem. Some
of the risks that could cause us to set a trigger include economic and
political risks, risk from geopolitical events, risk of central bank policy
changes, corporate earnings and/or industry sector risks, inflation and interest
rates…. The list goes on and on. The trigger literally forces us to make a
non-emotional decision because it is based on an indentifiable risk with a pre-defined
action. While we may not be correct 100% of the time on our forecasts (and no
one is), taking a pro-active policy towards risk enables us to address a very
important part of investment management in a reasonable and rational way and
avoid making emotional decisions in the wake of news events that may have
already moved the markets significantly.
No comments:
Post a Comment